Identifying Varietals in the Discourse of American and Korean Scientists: A Contrastive Corpus Analysis Using the Gramulator
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this study, we identify systematic discourse characteristics in the academic writings of Korean and American scientists. Specifically, we employ Contrastive Corpus Analysis (CCA) using the computational tool, The Gramulator to extract statistically improbable “n gram” features that occur across texts. The results indicate that Korean scientists use non standard varietal forms of English (i.e., forms that are correct but relatively uncommon with their American counterparts). We conclude that the Korean scientists’ use of these varietals may be a key factor in interpreting and evaluating their work as non protypical in terms of discourse style. Our findings bring to light language characteristics and a methodology that may be helpful to language learners as well as materials developers.
منابع مشابه
A Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis of Stance Strategies in Native and Nonnative Speakers’ English Academic Writings: Introduction and Discussion Sections in Focus
The present study was an attempt to illustrate the interaction between writers and readers. Conveying of the writers’ voice, stance, and interaction with reader was put forward within this paradigm. Being a good academic writer is highly related to the use of these strategies. Adopting a position and persuading readers of claims are very important. This study was aimed at showing th...
متن کاملA Contrastive Study of Persian and English Written Discourse: Ellipsis in Realistic Novels
This study aspires to examine the concept of ellipsis by comparing and contrasting English and Persian written texts. For this purpose, three Persian novels and three English ones were selected. These novels were analyzed carefully; they were compared and contrasted for types and amount of ellipsis used, through a Chi-square analysis. The results of the data analysis revealed that various t...
متن کاملDifferential Linguistic Features in U.S. Immigration Newspaper Articles: A Contrastive Corpus Analysis Using the Gramulator
We use the Gramulator to conduct a computational contrastive analysis on texts printed in states that border Mexico and Canada. The results suggest strong lexical differences between the regions. The primary factor in the southern border states is security, whereas factors in the northern border states are citizenship and family. The results reveal differing regional perspectives, offering insi...
متن کاملDiscourse Markers in Political Interviews: A Contrastive Study of Persian and English
Due to the significance of multiculturalism in politics, and the central role linguistic devices play in organizing the political discourse, this text-based qualitative study was carried out to compare political interviews in the Iranian and English contexts to find out the probable similarities and differences in the use of discourse markers (DMs) between the two cultures. To this end, three s...
متن کاملA Cross-Disciplinary Genre Analysis of Rhetorical Features of Research Article Introductions Written by Iranians
The notion of genre has received a great deal of attention both in discourse analytic studies as well as in the field of ESP/EAP course design. The present paper has attempted to use genre analysis to account for the rhetorical features of research article introductions written by Iranian academics in two disciplinary fields of Education and Economics. The corpus comprised 40 research article i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010